Thanks, Steve, for reminding about the
power supply being internal to the Century 21.
Yep, that would explain the height difference
between the C21 and other rigs which are
without the internal power supply.
And my apologies to you and everyone about
my typo -- my notes indeed have Triton
written in them, and not Trident (which I
believe are submarines). Don't know what
I was thinking at the time....
The updated lineage, released as version
1 will be out in a day or so. I'm hoping the
manager of the unofficial Ten Tec pages
will find a place amongst the articles to
store a copy for everyone.
Cheers/73. Kevin, K9IUA
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Kevin Anderson, K9IUA, Lincoln/Bismarck ND
e-mail: K9IUA@juno.com Opinions all my own.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:55:07 -0500 "Steve Ellington" <n4lq@iglou.com>
writes:
>I have to agree, the C21 was an odd duck. Rather huge considering it
>had a
>simple direct conversion receiver in it. But then, how many TenTec
>products
>ran on AC? Some keyers, the T-100, 315, VFO-200 and maybe a few
>amplifiers.
>The B+ voltage in the C21 was also unusually high, about 40v as I
>recall.
>The C22 was a real turn around with it's more modern, fine plastics.
>Steve Ellington
>N4LQ
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin L Anderson <k9iua@juno.com>
>To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 9:51 PM
>Subject: [TenTec] "Lineage" follow-up questions
>
>
>>
>>Ten-Tec Experts --
>>
>>I have not received any further comments in several
>>days (essentially since I submitted the updated
>>production start years about two weeks ago).
>>
>>One year that I have not heard back on:
>>
>>**** When was the Century 21 Digital model first
>>introduced? ****
>>
>>Otherwise, I at least have reasonably close approximations
>>for the other models and will post the updated list
>>sometime soon.
>>
>>Another question:
>>
>>*** Why does the Century 21 look so different than
>>everything else produced by Ten Tec? ****
>>
>>Now many will say the Century 21 is good looking
>>(and I do not mean to question your assessment <grin>),
>>but when you compare it to all the other transceivers
>>pictured on the unofficial web site, no other Ten Tec
>>box even comes close in appearance. The C21 is tall
>>compared to its width. It is not in the same nice looking
>>box that has been the staple of Ten Tec since the
>>PowerMites started it all. Now I will admit that I
>>have not seen a Trident I or II -- is that similar to
>>the Century 21?
>>
>>Oh well, just musing on a Friday evening.
>>
>>So, up ahead is an updated set of transceiver lineage
>>notes for distribution.... Somebody else can document
>>the amplifiers, as I don't have any such heavy iron (a
>>QRP operator, I am).
>>
>>Cheers/73. Kevin, K9IUA
>>owner of 3 T-T rigs: Century 22, Scout, Argosy II
>>
>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>Kevin Anderson, K9IUA, Lincoln/Bismarck ND
>>e-mail: K9IUA@juno.com Opinions all my own.
>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>>________________________________________________________________
>>GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
>>Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
>>Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
>>http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
>>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>>
>>
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
|