| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Performance Measures in QST |
| From: | aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox) |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Apr 2002 23:45:13 -0500 |
>I know the guys in the ARRL Lab, and they do NOT scrimp on the tests! They may not scrimp on the tests ... so why don't they say something about the HORRIBLE keying that they show in the pictures ? Look at the 756 Pro II ... and tell me that rig has decent QSK keying ? Yet ... not a negative word about such 'features' in the review text ... Sorry, they've lost the edge when the reviews read like advertising and overlook the results of their own testing such as I noted above. 73 Billy AA4NU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Estate sale of W5SXZ- complete Ten-Tec station, Thomas C. Jednacz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Performance Measures in QST, Rick Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Performance Measures in QST, Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Performance Measures in QST, Rick Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |