I very rarely go to eHam since I have seen practically no value-add to that
site. In the case of the subject Centurion review I had to go there and
read it for myself. A rating of "0" is certainly way out of line and
without merit based on what I read. I wouldn't even call N6VUJ's dribble a
review, it was more of a child-like whining session and the moderator of the
site acted correctly in moving it out of the review section. Perhaps N6VUJ
has some "screws loose" of his own for which his parents perhaps should have
returned him to the "factory" and got their money back!
Reid, K7YX
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Notarius WN3VAW [mailto:wn3vaw@fyi.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:42 PM
To: tentec
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review
I think a request to the reviews manager for a more detailed explanation for
this is in order before we jump to any conclusions or start saying things we
might later regret.
73, ron wn3vaw
"And they give you cash,
which is just as good as money!"
Yogi Berra, AFLAC Commercial, 2002
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve M <wmoorejr@cox.net>
To: tentec <tentec@contesting.com>; David Hammond <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review
Hello David,
I agree 100%. He owned the amp, wrote an honest review, it should stay in
the reviews. Notice the amp now has a perfect record?
I seriously doubt anyone at eham just read it and said "oh this isn't
a valid review, we'll have to move this". Not without some whiners helping!
This kind of %^$#& reminds me of recent insider trading scandals--they
both stink.
73,
Steve wd0ct
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Hammond" <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
To: "tentec reflector" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:36 PM
Subject: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Several of you commented on the Eham review yesterday about the negative
> experience that one person encountered with the Centurion amp. I don't own
> an amp so I cannot comment first hand. My point on writing is for a much
> different reason.
>
> Eham reviews have become a major contributing influence to major purchases
> we all make. This afternoon I noted that something disturbing to me has
> happened. The review has been removed by Eham from the product review
> category.
>
> When I inquired as to why, I was informed by Eham that it did not meet the
> definitions of a "Product Review" so it was moved into the "Company Forum
> Category" elsewhere on the Eham site. Quietly moved to where it does not
add
> or subtract to the product rating score. Say it ain't so Joe!
>
> IMO if that review did not reflect one man's opinion about a product's
> performance I do not know what does. Ever see a favorable opinion on a
> "company's performance" of any manufacturer so relocated by Eham when it
> appears in any other "product review"?
>
> I found the review to be reasonable, honest and forthright. Based on your
> experiences you may or may not agree and that's your prerogative to so do.
> But manipulating a reasonable opinion as was presented in that ham's
review
> reveals a flaw in Eham's process. This review as represented was a product
> problem that was turned into a customer service problem plain and simple.
>
> No one is perfect, me, you or Ten Tec and that's not what I mean to imply
> but............
>
> Is it more than coincidental that Ten Tec is an Eham advertiser? I hope
> not.
>
> Buyer and reader beware!
>
> 73 de N1LQ-Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|