TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] USB -> RS232

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] USB -> RS232
From: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:29:56 -0600
> 
> You may want to check your USB com port base address and IRQ 
> status.  If they're not in the "traditional" areas, e.g. COM1 @ 0x3f8
> IRQ4, the control packages may not work.  I've had this problem in 
> the past, both with USB and PCI serial devices.
> 
> It might be possible to force the USB com port settings to 
> something like COM3 or COM4 via Windows' Device Manager.
> 
> Al, K2ZN

Ah, Windows. There was an recent editorial in one of the computer magazines 
saying how, after all these years, Windows is still not any easier to use, 
really; still not where it needs to be in terms of plug-it-in-and-go. Yet, the 
GUI is packed full of icons, shortcuts, accelerator keys, hidden menus, 
animation, colors, right-click, and on and on... none of which serves the basic 
robustness of the operating system, nor its user-friendliness, but serves to 
make the OS larger and larger. "Windows expands to fill the available space," 
as they say. I still need to reboot my machine (Windows 2000) periodically to 
recover stability after an application does something illegal.

I used to be a UNIX engineer. All I ever heard from users and people learning 
the operating system was how cryptic it was. And it can be. But you know what? 
That's what a computer science degree is for: to train you to deal with 
complexity and computer languages. And you know what? We had machines that had 
been running for well over a year without once being restarted (don't say 
'reboot' around UNIX people; they will pooh-pooh your obvious PC background) 
and they showed not the slightest sign of instability or unpredictable 
behavior. 

Roughly speaking, PC's running Windows at 1 GHz or more with gobs of RAM are 
about as fast as 200 MHz UNIX machines. This alone is an indication of the 
efficiency of the system. When Windows/NT came out, it was billed as finally 
ready for 'mission-critical' applications. That's not quite true. If I were in 
intensive care, I would not trust the operation of my respirator to Windows NT. 
Give me an old, beat-up UNIX box any day. I'll sleep better.

I wonder how many people would trade in their Windows computer with its glitzy 
desktop for a machine with a non-Windows operating system that *worked*, no 
matter what, did everything you needed it to do, never crashed, never hung up, 
allowed multiple users to log in, and the only 'penalty' was that you had to 
give up some conveniences?

A really good analogy is a shiny new KenSuCom with dozens of cool knobs and 
buttons, but that chops dits on CW and has horrible phase noise and 
intermodulation.

I really hope you get your USB-to-serial converter going. 

I feel much better now that I got that off my chest.

Al  W6LX







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>