TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564
From: Ernie Stedman" <ernie@n2ojq.com (Ernie Stedman)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:54:03 -0400
I was told by the factory there is no difference between a 563 with Option 3
and a 564, so I don't believe it is misleading at all to call a 563 with
Option 3 a VI Plus, but I'm just going on what they told me.

Ernie Stedman N2OJQ
130 Buckthorn Court
Roswell GA  30076

Sign up for PAYPAL by following this link:
https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=n2ojq%40bellsouth.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "MIKE SOUHRADA" <wb9iog@revealed.net>
To: "Ron Pletter" <ron@plet.net>
Cc: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564


> Ron Pletter wrote:
> > But I am finding folks posting to the list model 563 which was upgraded
to
> > option 3, and are calling it an Omni VI Plus.  Even the used/demo list
from
> > TenTec uses the teminology "Omni-VI factory upgraded to Omni-VI Plus"
for a
> > model 563.
>  a model 563 with Option 3 upgrade now called Omni-VI
> > Plus?  Or is the term being used loosely?
>
> Ron as I'm saving my shekels for the Omni VI+. I've noticed the mis use
> of the "factory upgrade" vs VI+ on frequent listings. Sometimes it's not
> even clear what unit it is.
> Frankly the upgrade version doesn't interest me at all and those who are
> selling
> the 563 probably want the best buck.
> I understand with the full options (3) there is no difference
> electronically,
> but I could be wrong.
> The term is not only being used loosely but in some cases misleads a
> potential
> buyer.
>
> Mike
> Iowa
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>