Since there is no TXCO, how much does it drift, typically?
John N1JM
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-admin@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-admin@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Mark Erbaugh
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: wa3fiy@radioadv.com; Carl Moreschi; tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX-320
Also, no FM reception. I agree, it's a great receiver.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
To: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 13:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX-320
> On 8 Dec 2002 at 23:14, Carl Moreschi wrote:
>
> > The only real differences are no attenuator, no rf gain control, no
> > noise blanker, no noise reduction, and no auto notch. Also, it runs
> > at 1200 baud instead of 57600 baud so it responds much slower to
> > comands and is easy to overrun with software commands. But it's
> > receiver performance is surprisingly good. I rate it the best
> > receiver buy in ham radio.
> >
> I concur. May be one of the best kept secrets around.
>
> I like to have an RF gain on a receiver so I simply wired a 500
> ohm pot between the antenna cable and the antenna input
> connector. Really helps when the band is full of BIG signals.
>
> -73-
>
> -Lee-
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002
|