| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 60M |
| From: | Ynkedragon@aol.com |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Fri, 16 May 2003 08:20:47 EDT |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 05/16/2003 01:17:12 Eastern Daylight Time, wn3vaw@fyi.net writes: << I didn't expect (after the NTIA through in their last minute objections... and wasn't it after the close of comments? So much for following the rules) all 150 kHz that was requested. I thought we might get 50 kHz to start, at least. But 5 channels at roughly 3 kHz per voice... 15 kHz? Sheesh. Why bother? >> Hmmm, what if we told the FCC, "Thanks, but no thanks. Keep it!" k3yd |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Hz, kHz, Mhz, Ghz, AC5E |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SCOUT packaging for the field, Bwana Bob |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Rock-bound & snivlin' (was 60M), Dave Kamp, KW0D |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 60M, k6se |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |