| To: | "Ten-Tec Reflector" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M |
| From: | "john, ke5c" <ke5c@hot.rr.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Fri, 16 May 2003 10:50:19 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> I believe the organizations you list above were objecting to the 135/136 > kHz assignment, not 60M... they may have objected to 135/136 also, but paragraphs 26 through 30 are under the "5250-5400 kHz Band (RM-10209)" section. paragraph 26 begins "In opposition, the United Power Line council (UPLC) argues that the 5000 kHz band ...". http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-105A1.doc |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SCOUT packaging for the field, Bwana Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 60M, George, W5YR |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] (Say 73 to) 60M, Terry Gaiser |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] 9 mHz filters, John L Merrill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |