John, in all fairness, the "working over" that appeared on the reflector was
offset by a factor of about 10 to 1 in the number of private emails I got
thanking me for my unintentional but frank posting and agreeing with my
concerns at that time.
A few vocal and perhaps overly emotional people find it hard to accept
criticism however objectively it may be offered. Fortunately, I have a
pretty tough old hide and tend to ignore such antics, taking comfort in the
ATTABOYs that roll in still.
Thanks for your thoughts and consideration, John.
73/72, George
Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE
"Starting the 58th year and it just keeps getting better!"
w5yr@att.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Rippey" <w3uls@3n.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group
> Jim Lowman has done a great job administering the Ten-Tec reflector
groups.
> I belong to this one and the QTH group. I find the QTH group's postings
are
> more focused and concise, whereas we can--and do--get into
> near-philosophical threads on this reflector that can seem endless. Also,
I
> don't recall seeing any flames on the QTH site. Remember the working over
> W5YR got here a while back?
>
> All in all, I think both reflectors serve a useful purpose, but I don't
> have to administer them.
>
> John, W3ULS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|