TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Reply-to: Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>,tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:34:13 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Before doing that, you should talk to a top notch quality control person and
see
what the minimum sample size should be.

You wouldn't want to find yourself in a situation where you have every piece
of equipment traceable, procedures documented, etc. and have a statistically
invalid sample size.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 17:24
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion


> > Even if calibrated to a milli db, one still has to address the rir to
rig
> > variability even
> > within a single production run much less run to run or yesr to year.
>
> Agreed.  It would be interesting to run performance tests on a sample of
ten
> Orions and ten K2's from different builders and compare performance
> consistency across units.  This may actually be more important of a test
> than the individual numbers as measured by the ARRL Lab.
>
> 73,
>
> -Pail, W9AC
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>