TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] Equipment reviews.

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Equipment reviews.
From: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Reply-to: Rick@dj0ip.de, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:22:56 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yuri, I like your approach (hands-on). - 73 - Rick

("Just do it").

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of K3BU@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:11 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews.

In a message dated 12/17/03 3:49:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
ac5e@comcast.net writes:

>>Perhaps a completely automated series of tests, with the best
available
test equipment calibrated to NIST standards at the beginning of
each test, would
satisfy the technically oriented part of our community.<<

I am not going to argue about difference of 0.001 of dB between
tests, but
come down hard on 4 pin 1960 Heathkit mike connector :-)

Lets wait and see, If you like it, tell others and work me in the
contest, if
you don't, tell me or hit DEL key. I hope to fine tune the
reviews to fill
the gaps.

Yuri
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>