Yes, agree about the name. The basic concepts are well known. Not an issue
for me.
Was going to put a flat top on it and pull it up to the vertical for even
better low angle radiation but never got around to it.
Good enough to work VK from GU on 160m CW with my early Paragon.
73 de Mike
GU3WHN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sinisa Hristov" <shristov@ptt.yu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Sloper
> Mike Sloan wrote:
>
> > Just an idea that works very well at:
>
> > http://www.cwgsy.net/private/gu3whn/station.html
>
>
> Nice example of what I did recommend to Ken.
> Call it any name you like, I just see a good old
> trapped dipile, distorted to fit the space.
> Adding the second "radial" is also a good idea.
>
> Nice to see that you had no need to push RF into soil :-)
>
>
> 73,
>
> Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|