TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range
From: w7kxb@comcast.net
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 07:47:31 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My experience with the Jupe on FD was not too good as far as receiving  in a 
multiple transmitter enviroment.  I would stay with the K2.  Another solution , 
though not too popular, would be to have each operator supply his own rig. That 
would eliminate the learning phase for operators on new SDR rigs.  YMMV
Carry on
Bill_Harris 


> Hi,
> 
> Our club is considering buying a Jupiter.  I have never seen one, let alone 
> operated one.  We plan to get and show the company video on it.  Other rigs 
> under consideration are an ICOM 746PRO and a K2/100.  Important features 
> are the ability of new/non-technical hams to operate, performance in field 
> day or a field day type environment with another rig on adjacent bands, 
> filters,  DPS NR and ability to operate CW (preferably QSK), phone and 
> digital.  I have a K2/100 and borrowed a IC746PRO to set it aside the 
> K2/100 and do an A/B comparison.  I know spec wise, the K2 has the best 
> receiver in most things important, but specs aren't all the game.  I used 
> my K2/100 on last field day, and other operators had no problems with most 
> things, but DSP was not one of them; too hard to operate its DSP NR.  The 
> previous two years, I used my OMNI-VI for field day, but it had some 
> problems in the field day environment.  You couldn't read the dial in 
> sunlight for one.
> 
> How does the Jupiter stack up against the two aforementioned rigs?
> 
> TNX for the information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>