TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Jupiter

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter
From: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:32 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I don't think that's the point - the firmware is a different level of
code than Carl's code, and has many more limitations including those of
time to develop, test, etc,. in order to get the rig to market.  I think
Geoff was speaking to the development cycle and it's very tight time
requirements.

        73,  Duane


On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:21:55 -0500 Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
writes:
> "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote:
> 
> > Actually  I think it's a very valid comparision. It shows what one 
> person
> > can do without production deadlines or FCC certifcation. If he had 
> to
> > do what TenTec does with each release, he simply would not produce 
> anything.
> 
> 
> Are you seriously suggesting that TenTec performs FCC certification
> with each release?
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 


--------------------------------------
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas

http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>