TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:42:38 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
NQ5T:
 >Close-spaced numbers aren't specified of course for anything under 5 Khz,
and it will take someone who isn't dependent on advertising revenue to
test/publish those

         Grant, this seems to be a common misconception since
someone on the Yahoo FT-9000 reflector made almost the
identical comment...

--- In 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FTdx-9000/post?postID=B4Vj8URB5AYPgdVls5jhhVBG5QyZTuooBxXdsocaZOOyhNIBQiBpAjfckRTYU_5Si3e0VhePlKUJHCvl3JXD66BcfQ>FTdx-9000@yahoogroups.com,
 
"n9rou" <n9rou@c...> wrote:

 > Independent testers will have to
 > find out the performance at down to 1 khz spacing where the TT Orion
 > excels.

No, 1 kHz IMD and BDR performance will be included in ARRL's
Expanded Test Report which should be available in a few weeks.
1 kHz results have been included in the swept IMD and BDR
graphs for all products reviewed in ETR's since about 1998.

73, Bill W4ZV



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>