Peter:
My findings are that the Tentec filters have less ripple across the passband
but the INRAD filters have a more symmetrical and sharper slope on both the
upper and lower sides. I prefer the Tentec filters in my Omni VI Plus.
You choice of a CW listening frequency will require the use of the INRAD
filters however.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Bertram" <dj2zs@t-online.de>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: [TenTec] (Inrad-)filter for OMNI VI - some advice needed
> Hello list!
>
> I am going to order filters for an OMNI VI+ but need some advice before
> doing
> so.
>
> The question is: does the combination of the filters # 753 (9000.6 kHz)
> and #
> 760 (9000.75 kHz) make sense or it is better to order # 759 and # 760
> (both
> centered at 9000.75 kHz)? I prefer to listen to a frequency of about 400
> Hz
> but do not want the af-frequency to alter when switching from 400 Hz to
> 250
> Hz.
>
> Another question is: do the above mentioned filters made by Inrad make a
> real
> advantage vs. those from TenTec?
>
>
> 73, Peter, DJ2ZS
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|