TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:46:05 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Or wife came into the shack, dog barked, coffee spilled etc. etc.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists


> >How many times have you heard one give a signal
> report of 59 or such then 
> followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"?  Now
> looking at that analogy 
> of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 =
> Extremely strong 
> signals.  From that we must deduct that the
> transmitting station's audio was 
> terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed
> deaf from using 
> headphones for years.<
> 
> You may deduce that, what I would deduce is that the
> reporting operator doesn't want to hurt the other
> operator's feelings by giving him the 22 or 33 he
> deserves.  
> 
> bang bang... rifle shot....
> 
> 73  W9OY
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>