TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:38:36 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
And OH MY, how we as humans do resist change.

73
Bob, K4TAX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up


>> What about CW?
>
> Some things are just forever :-)  I think it will continue to be fostered 
> in
> a contest context at a minimum, even after the requirement is eliminated.
> At least for a time.
>
> The numbers of active CW ops along with a little clear space will 
> certainly
> keep dwindling.  Some countries have already eliminated formal band plans.
> And proposals such as RM-11305 are sticking out there, which, even if
> rejected this time could eventually make headway. Total self-regulation
> reads well on paper, but entropy is a certain thing and the result may not
> be pleasant for anyone.
>
> I suppose the digi robot and digital voice mode proponents will ultimately
> go after SSB, too, and that generation of hams will be fiercely discussing
> the "problem" of old guys using an old fashioned voice mode wandering
> outside of the "SSB Window" :-)
>
> Times change ....
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>