TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII
From: Ira Franklin <k4ymq@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 04:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It's great to have 6 meters on new Omni 7, how ever it only covers 50 to 54 
mhz. The 48, 49 and 55 Mhz range is used by 6 meter operators as a propagation 
indicator since those frequency ranges are used by TV stations for video 
carriers
  Ira 
  K4YMQ
  

Grant Youngman <nq5t@comcast.net> wrote:
  > The requirement to have general-coverage on receive has 
> always puzzled me. 

> But how many of us
> actually tune the shortwave broadcast bands?

General coverage receive and transmit is essential to services other than
the Amateur Radio Service. MARS, for example. MARS, contrary to common
mythology, is NOT dead. Some MARS frequencies are close to the ham bands
(typically local/regional nets), but many are a long ways away.

Many of us tune the shortwave bands. If you don't, try it. You might find
a lot of interesting stuff out there. Don't dismiss it outright, with a
wave of the "how stupid is that" wand ..... :-(

Grant/NQ5T 




_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


                        
---------------------------------
See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com.  Check it out.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>