To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX |
From: | "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:00:28 +1100 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I have monitored these lists for a coupla of years. I have an Orion 1 and now 2 as well. I cannot resist a short comment on calling DX with "processed" signals. I get my share of piles especially in contests where they can be 20 or 30 deep after I'm put on packet. I always work the cleanest clearest signal first. They usually have less lows and more highs in their audio but they are clean. That is why sometimes a QRP signal gets through before the KW. If someone is badly distorted and therefore stops me hearing the rest of the signals I will work them to get rid of them but the log has a nil mark so that they do not get a QSL card. In a contest if they are not a new mult I may not even log them at all. Simply the cleanest clearest signal gets through first - not just from operator choice but because they come through the pile best. 73 Martin VK7GN P.S. HiFi audio is not good for cracking a pile up - too much power wasted in the lows where there is no intelligibility. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Need some General and opinions of the Omni V, JBaumgarte |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX, Henrik Weiss |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec]More from Rob Sherwood, NCØB Re: Is the Orion Noisy?], Grant Youngman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Working DX, Henrik Weiss |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |