TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII
From: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

"Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net> wrote:  On Wed, 2007-06-20 
at 21:58 -0400, John Rippey wrote:
> I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the 
> OMNI VII.
> 
> It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I 
> would have thought there would be discussion of the review and lab 
> results. Not so.
> 
> Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list? 
> Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks 
> who want to operate remotely?
> 
> That's certainly the theme of Ten-Tec's advertising, at least. 
> 
The reveiw was discussed quite a bit when it first appeared on the ARRL
web page a few weeks ago.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


       
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>