TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] More ARRL Lab Data

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] More ARRL Lab Data
From: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:51:08 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The October review of the FT-2000D in QST, now posted, contains an article by Mike Tracy outlining further refinements in the Lab's testing regimen. Oh, brother, he's leaving me behind.

What comes through for me in the October review is that the FT-2000, along with the PRO III of the DSP rigs, has to labor long and hard to equal the IMD3 results for the discontinued Mark V, and do not equal the IMD3 of an unmodified OMNI VI.

So if one wants to remain analog, you can go with an INRAD roofing filter mod and be well ahead of the game. Of course, there are refinements in the DSP rigs that make them (perhaps) more fun to use, but the basics have yet to be bettered. (Exceptions, ORION and IC-7800, but then you get with these high-performing rigs the troublesome DSP/AGC artifacts R. Sherwood has noted.)

Does the OMNI VII avoid the DSP artifacts bug?

73,
John, W3ULS
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>