TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI 9MHZ filters

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI 9MHZ filters
From: "J. W. (Dub) Thornton" <dub@oklahoma.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:25:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Paul:

As Clarke advised, pay very close attention to the adjustment of the PBT.
A tiny bit off in this adjustment can make a big dif in the apparent 
attenuation
of the 250hz filter.

"73"  Dub

At 12:09 AM 10/24/2007, you wrote:
>I put in a 219 250 hz filter in the 9 mhz if slot. It replaced a 400 hz
>Inrad filter. I find that it has quite a bit of attenuation (maybe 10db?).
>But it does reduce the QRN a lot. This is on 80 & 160m.
>
>Do others find this or maybe I have a bad filter. And yes I have the jumper
>in the high gain position. And boy does it narrow up the passband.
>
>I have not had time to see if this makes the difference in copying DX in the
>noise or not.
>
>I think that I tried a 221 filter and did not like it for some reason, I
>dont remember. Different center frequency?
>
>Any comments or suggestions?
>
>Thanks
>73 Paul K9OT
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

-- 
J. W.  (Dub) Thornton  K5DUB
Minco, OK.  

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>