TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II
From: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:15:22 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
or Orion 565 and OII 566 ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John K Gotwals" <john@gotwals.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II


>I sometimes use the term "Orion I", because if I don't  the listener often
> asks me if I am using the I or II. Rather than going into a discourse 
> about
> JKF and JFK Jr, I find it easier to just specify Orion I up front.
>
> John, N9JG
>
> = = = = = Original message = = = = =
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:49:00 -0600
> From: Leo Bricker K5LDB <k5ldb.leo@gmail.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <479CA7EC.1030907@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> [snip]
> Just as JFK didn't suddenly change to JFK I when JFK Jr came along,
> the Orion  didn't change into the Orion I. It's either Orion / Orion
> II or it's O /  O II / O 2. DROP THE I. There is no I associated with
> the original  Orion, Roman or otherwise.
>
> -- 
> 73 K5LDB
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>