TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
From: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:57:19 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
And I would like to add...low current, bullet proof, high voltage finals. 
Would require a dual voltage power supply though....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Reynolds" <dave@k6wrf.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey


> RECIEVER
> iF YOU CAN'T HEAR UM YOU CAN'T WORK UM.
>
>         73
>                  DAVE K6WRF
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ten-Tec Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
>
>
>> Joel R. Hallas wrote:
>>> Yes, I wonder if it is particularly significant that one of the most
>>> important features to me, a solid second receiver, did not make their
>>> list!
>>>
>>> Regards, Joel
>>> Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
>>>
>> There is a fill-in-the blank question on the survey that asks you to
>> tell us:
>>
>> What do you think is the most important item or feature on an HF
>> transceiver?
>>
>> 73
>> Scott Robbins
>> W4PA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>