| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Balun Isolator |
| From: | "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 May 2008 15:17:41 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Stuart - that has been done also - by and Engineer at Belden I think - I cant remember right now who did it but if I find it again I will send it . He used a "triaxial method " with the coax under test inside another outer conductor .http://www.tennadyne.com/pdf/coaxial_tenn.pdf I was wrong it was Times Wire and Cable - here is a link to the Tennadyne site that has the paper. Alos says much was in QST in April 1981. 73 Hank K7HP That is a good project for someone to measure how much current passes thru the 5 per cent open space. Since the shield wires criss cross in good woven shields, there may be more shorting of the current, than you would expect. The shield density affects the bending radius of the cable and its flexibility. Of course, using less shield wires lowers the cost of production. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Balun Isolator, Ronald C. McConnell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Coax shields, Ken Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Balun Isolator, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |