TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield
From: "Chuck & Vicki Tifft" <cftifft@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:15:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well, all you have to do is consider the source. Since it is a US goverment requirement (RFR testing), you know it is flawed.. Thanks Ron, I have wholeheartly agreed with everything you have said..

W6RD
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim WA9YSD" <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield


Leukemia  I read the survey results From the FCC and other publications
on biological effects or RFI.  No authority on the subject by a long
shot.  Magnetic fields and inadequate shielding is a hazard.  Follow
the ARRL publications on the distances and FCC requirements for annual
testing of your station, and you cannot go wrong.  The fact that they
even want us to do this should say HAY THERE IS SOMETHING TO THIS !
Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>