TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:49:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ultraviolet covers much more of the spectrum than visible light does, beginning right above the wavelengths we can see and extending into the X-ray range as you can see in this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-ionizing_radiation

This may also explain the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.

        Ron  N6IE
     www.N6IE.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Carter" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield


Ron Castro wrote:
 The frequencies of ionizing radiation are well above the visible
 light frequencies and part way through the ultra violet range.

Ron,

Thanks for the response. However, I'm still a bit confused (a fairly
normal state for me).   ;-)

First, maybe it is just semantics, but I personally would not call
anything "well above the visible light frequencies" RF as the OP was
implying.

Finally, you say "well above the visible light frequencies and part way
through the ultra violet range".
I thought that ultra violet was -immediately- above visible blue, not
"well above".

 Ron  N6IE www.N6IE.com


 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carter" <k8vt@ameritech.net> To:
 "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent:
 Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:37 AM Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield


> Gary Hoffman wrote:
>
>> And, of course, as you already know, RF that is high enough in
>> frequency is in fact ionizing radiation.
> Gary, I did NOT know that.
>
> How high is "high enough in frequency"? What power levels? (Could
> just a milliwatt or two of RF have enough power to cause
> ionization, no matter what the frequency?)
>
>> It does not have to come from a "nuclear source".
> This could be x-rays. Is that what you are referring to? However,
> you stated above "*RF* that is high enough...", and I don't know if
>  I would define x-rays as 'RF'. Or maybe the whole issue is just a
> matter of semantics.
>
> Could you please elaborate a bit if you are alluding to something
> other than x-rays or if you are calling x-rays 'RF'. Thanks, Carter
>  K8VT
>
> _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
>  TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
 TenTec@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>