TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up
From: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:40:33 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Do you find the Double Bazooka to be quieter? ie. less prone to man-made 
electrical noise? That's been my experience when I lived in an area with 7KV 
and 13KV overhead service.



Best regards,
Gary - AB9M
CSM(r) G.L.Huber
9679 Heron Bay Road
Bloomington, Illinois 61704
(309)662-0604
www.csm-gh.com
csm-gh@www.csm-gh.com
gary.huber@us.army.mil
ab9m@arrl.net
www.csm-gh.com/mytrike.htm
www.csm-gh.com/75thRepoDepo.htm





>From: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <TenTec@contesting.com>
>Subject: [TenTec] Double bazooka antenna==a follow up
>Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:34:58 -0400
>
>Gang!
>
>The antenna company sent a replacement antenna for the one that was
>causing all those weird problems I was having.
>
>The double bazooka is now up and it seems to work as it should.
>
>Bottom line?
>
>No feed line problems
>No connector problems
>
>BAD antenna!
>
>
>Thanks for all those that help..
>
>Now.. all I need is a handful of sun spots.
>
>Mike, WB8VGE
>SunLight Energy Systems
>The Heathkit Shop
>http://www.theheathkitshop.com/
>J e e p
>o|||||||o
>Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a
>large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>