| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire |
| From: | "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net> |
| Reply-to: | geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:56:48 -0600 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 14:52 -0700, Jim WA9YSD wrote: > Doc, what do you consider close space open line? 6 inches? > > Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD > 6" at 160 meters, 1/8" at 2m. E.g. less than 0.001 wave length. Might accept 0.01 wavelength. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, insulated wire for aerial, Jim Brown K9YC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, insulated wire for aerial, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, Jim WA9YSD |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, Jim WA9YSD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |