| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire |
| From: | Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:07:56 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Spacing for power handling right. I believe 6 inch was used because of long
distant runs say 300 feet or more. To the antennas back in the horse and buggy
days, I mean Model T days. They used High impedance antennas because they had
to run feed line for long distances.
You might want to float a 10M loop on the inside of that and/or what ever band
your having a hard time tuneing it on, and see if it improves things. Put it
in like a quad element hanging on ropes tune it but do not tie it to the feed
line. That way you will not have to build an ex-stream tuner.
Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Some Omni-V bugs, Ralph Matheny |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, Jim WA9YSD |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |