TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT testing insulation dielectric properties

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT testing insulation dielectric properties
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:56:44 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
We have a textbook that has a formula for insulation loss showing it is directly proportional to frequency without any discussion of exceptions. Of course, a resonant amount of material would behave uniquely at its self resonant frequency. But, I won't belabor the insulation test. I think we all agree that PVC has higher capacitance loss factor than other insulators such as poly plastics. They have not offered polyethylene zip cord to my knowledge, but I sometimes look up the product data sheet if there is one. The zip imports typically don't have enough info to track their formulas. We have had strong correlation at HF with small high intensity field folded antennas being designed in the lab, with the microwave test of modern plastics samples. When PVC frames were replaced with fiberglass board supports for antenna elements, the antenna efficiency went up in the Wheeler cap tests.

Sadly for RF use, in zip cord, PVC seems dominant in present, mostly imported, cabling. PVC has also taken over the pipe market, but for coil forms, you can find the effects of the PVC factors and compensate coil designs that use this material.

L. B. Cebik's web site, <www.cebik.com> also covers avoiding some PVC pipes that have additives in the plastic. In reference to PVC use in atenna construction and element support.

As a first order screening test, a microwave sample tested for heating is easy for any ham almost anywhere in the world.
Test and verify---

-Stuart
K5KVH


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>