TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes
From: "Kirk.Harding" <Kirk.harding@cox.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:39:47 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
And this is the why I purchased and enjoy the Flex 5000A.  I also have an
OII and have really enjoyed it.  Not only is the Flex 5000A feature rich, it
is my opinion that it outperforms the OII. Hope the folks at TT are
listening.  You need to pay attention to what your competition are doing.
Also in the wings is the Quick Silver(QS1R).  Right now it is only a SDR
with receive (multiple receivers)(2) capability.  Soon it will have transmit
capability.  
I suspect that this will create a little competition for Flex.  As a fellow
ham has said, "What a great time to be involved with ham radio."

73,

Kirk, K6KAR
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Dudley Hurry
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:22 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes

All this discussion of bandscopes,  the Flex has the best and most 
detailed,  and the main and 2nd are fullly detailed in the same screen 
with Point and shoot..  Now if TT could duplicate that detail... 

73,
Dudley

WA5QPZ



Rsoifer@aol.com wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> Yes, you're right.  The K3 has a better sub receiver (for amateur band
use) 
> than the Orion or O II.  I had forgotten about that, probably because all
I 
> ever use the sub receiver for, besides occasional general coverage
listening, is 
> spotting callers in pile-ups.  I find the O II sub receiver perfectly
adequate 
> for that, in my experience anyway.  I don't have a lot of strong locals to

> deal with out here in the desert -- just one really, and his 160m key
clicks are 
> so bad that nothing can get rid of him (hi).  
>
> Sub receiver strong-signal performance is more important in a contest 
> situation than for what I do, so once again I suspect that a contester's
choice of 
> radio may be different than mine.
>
> Tnx &  73,
>
> Ray W2RS
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/22/2008 3:21:18 PM GMT Standard Time, 
> barry.n1eu@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>   
>> The Orion and K3 are both great contesting radios but the subreceiver
>> in the K3 is actually usable when there are strong signals on the
>> band
>>     
>
>
>
>
> **************
> It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
> deal here.
>       
> (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>   


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.6/1627 - Release Date: 8/22/2008
6:48 AM

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>