TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 2.041XL first audio crash

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 2.041XL first audio crash
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:55:34 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Actually, I think this is good!  Ten Tec has, as we have all been wishing, 
gone back to allowing beta testing of their firmware.  500 hams using the 
radio 500 different ways are likely to find every bug out there in a matter 
of days, which we have!

I'm convinced that the code has been cleaned up allowing other existing 
lines of code to run better.  The NR definately works better QSK has been 
improved, headphone level improved, and AM is more stable, although I would 
love to see someone do some objective testing between the two versions. 
Having the AF AGC option is great, especially since you don't need to 
restart the radio as we were told.

BTW...I ran 455 QSO's running a full 100 Watts in the NAQP RTTY SOLP over 
the weekend with not a single problem.

         Ron Castro
 Chief Technical Officer
    Results Radio, LLC
               N6IE
      www.N6IE.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 2.041XL first audio crash


>I recall 3 or 4 weeks ago, just about the Orlando Hamfest time,  this
> firmware was still in the evaluation mode and it was known the evaluation
> was not completed per Tentec website.  On the other hand, hams screamed
> "where is it, where is it, it was promised, where is it?".  Well, now we 
> got
> it.
>
> May I suggest, just be careful and document in detail the issues (not 
> wants)
> and pass the info back to Tentec.  Also, look at it this way, this is a
> great exercise and evaluation in finding these bugs.  To that end on a
> positive note, some 200 to 300 hams operating the radio with the new
> firmware, I would say is certainly better than 2 or 3 or so at the 
> factory.
> Remember, I can never see my own errors and mistakes but I sure can pick 
> out
> others.
>
> Remember you want to be a part of the solution, not the problem.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 324 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>