TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up?
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:18:54 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
1) Tuners struggle most when they're dealing with low impedances at low 
frequencies. So, using an electrically short dipole on 160m and then 
dividing the impedance by 4 is a bad idea - much better to use a 1:1 if 
you need a Balun.
2) As others have said, a current Balun is a better choice than a 
voltage Balun (transformer) because the core is energised only by the 
common-mode current, not by the full Tx power.
3) If the 4:1 voltage balun is wound on a powder-iron core, chances are 
it has nowhere near enough winding inductance to be acting properly as a 
4:1 impedance transformer.

So if your tuner has an integral 4:1 voltage balun wound on a powder 
iron core, it'll be a poor performer on all 3 counts.

73,
Steve G3TXQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>