When a manufacturer offers a hardware mod, it is usually expected that
those who want the mod will pay for it, whether by ordering the parts kit or by
returning the radio for factory installation. So, as Ralph notes below,
why should firmware be different? I for one would be willing to pay a
reasonable fee for firmware updates if that would get the process off its rear
end where it seems to be at the moment.
While I understand why T-T is not following the open-source model (if
that's really what you want, buy a Flex), there is a middle ground: open the
source code to one or more approved developers and let them have at it.
My 2 cents worth, anyway.
73 Ray W2RS
In a message dated 11/15/2009 3:18:31 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
mathenyr@marietta.edu writes:
The idea that TT should (could) provide firmware at no cost
forever is, of course flawed from the get-go. There is NO
money coming in to pay for the development. I would have
(and still would) pay for new firmware, just like I pay for
new filters, dial lamps, etc. that I need for my Orion. That
suggestion both here and to TT has brought very negative response. I
don't understand that.
I suspect there is a bigger problem, however. Parts to support
something like the Orion line will not be available forever,
as the technology we have today changes so fast. While I
doubt there will ever be a day when one can't find a 12AU7 for
the ole boat anchor, a display for an Orion will be a tough
item to get in 5 years. Thus, it makes little sense to write
firmware for equipment that will be unusable for hardware
reasons.
I do hope that TT will open the source code and provide info
to allow others to write firmware for the radios. I would bet,
however, that will not happen. Ever.
73
Ralph K8RYU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|