TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] humm

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] humm
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:56:07 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes...and that is true Inductance notwithstanding !  <chuckle>

Of course, Jim was right, and I should have said "Impedance" and not 
resistance (or even Inductance) in my older post.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] humm


> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:58:04 -0600, Mike Gorniak wrote:
>
>>i Jim,
>
>>It's also worth mentioning that failure to bond antenna shields, telco,
>>catv, and power system grounds at the service entrance could jeopardize
>>one's insurance coverage. All amateurs should carefully review NEC
>>Articles 250 and 800. Compliance here can save much grief in the event
>>of a lightning strike.
>
>>73,
>
>>Mike NM7X
>
> YES!
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>