TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] humm

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] humm
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:56:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes...and that is true Inductance notwithstanding !  <chuckle>

Of course, Jim was right, and I should have said "Impedance" and not resistance (or even Inductance) in my older post.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] humm


On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:58:04 -0600, Mike Gorniak wrote:

i Jim,

It's also worth mentioning that failure to bond antenna shields, telco,
catv, and power system grounds at the service entrance could jeopardize
one's insurance coverage. All amateurs should carefully review NEC
Articles 250 and 800. Compliance here can save much grief in the event
of a lightning strike.

73,

Mike NM7X

YES!

Jim



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>