TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] InRad 902 Filter For Orion Sub-Receiver

To: Ten-Tec Reflector <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] InRad 902 Filter For Orion Sub-Receiver
From: Rick W <ve7tk@yahoo.ca>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:27:06 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well John the comments that follow are entirely subjective.  

The results are as you might expect when you change a 2-pole 15 kHz wide 
roofing filter with a 6-pole 4 or 5 kHz wide filter.  However, there are still 
some images of the primary strong signal getting through. I found that an image 
of the test signal (S9 +30 dB - that's over 1,500 uV and huge by any standard) 
appeared within 2.5 kHz of a primary  signal (sub-receiver in CW with a 900 Hz 
bandwidth and a 600 Hz filter in the 1000 Hz slot, and firmware 1.373b5). Some 
additional images appeared at 2.5 kHz intervals above and below this "phantom" 
signal. Both the modified and unmodified sub-receiver suffer from these 
self-generated signals at 2.5 kHz intervals. In both the un-modified and 
modified rig the signals decrease in strength as you tune off the primary 
frequency. In the modified rig the number of images is significantly reduced.



I don't know the source of the 2.5 kHz mixed signal BUT it is definitely not 
present in the Orion's main receiver. Since these phantom signals occur at such 
precise intervals my thought is that the 2.5 kHz source is likely generated 
somewhere in the sub-receiver's digital circuitry.



I'll leave the tracking down of this source to others.

Bottom line, I think it has improved the sub-receiver without any noticeable 
side effects..  Has it eliminated all the problems?  Short answer - no!

73,

Rick

VE7TK



Website:  http://www3.telus.net/ve7tk

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Re: [TenTec] InRad 902 Filter For Orion Sub-Receiver





John Oglesby 




Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:39:28 -0500
















Rick - What was the difference in sub-receiver performance when you 
installed the filter?  I assume you were trying to improve the strong 
signal performance - did it help?  Any side effects?

John
N9RE




      __________________________________________________________________
Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new Yahoo! 
Mail: http://ca.promos.yahoo.com/newmail/overview2/
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>