There is something to this issue about QST reviews. As I recall, the
reviewer of the Orion II said something like "I don't like the feel of this
radio because I'm used to Icom and I can't operate it the same way." In
addition, QST and other magazines that publish reviews still haven't come up
with a way of dealing with SDRs. The 2006 review of the OII was necessarily
based on 2006 firmware, which was far inferior to today's version.
73 Ray W2RS
In a message dated 9/27/2010 11:40:16 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
RRBunn@cox.net writes:
Too bad the reciver specs are not up to other Ten Tec radios. .5uV????
73 Rick
N4ASX
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of mike bryce
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
This has been an interesting thread. It got me out of the shadows.
I haven't looked it up but in 1978 the triton was someplace around $700
stripped with no noise blanker or cw filters, analog version.
today that's about over two grand.
take all the stuff out of a a radio that is so common like dual vfos,
memories, and the other controls and dohickies is like shooting yourself in
the foot while standing in a room full of gasoline fumes.
the IC 718 is priced around $600-$700 (Before you shoot me. I didn't look
up
the prices on line, but I'm close)
Even if Ten Tec could hit the $500 mark, make a few few bucks, the
reviewers
would rip the rig apart simply because it DOESN'T have the thingiees and
dohickies we've come to accept as 'normal.'
Can't you just hear the QST reviewer saying something like. "The new entry
radio from Ten Tec disappointed us because it lacked the basic dual VFO
design of its competitors. To market a radio that won't allow split
operation on the HF bands is beyond our thinking."
Especially, if the competition had all those features and was only $100
more.
Sure Ford could come out with a automobile without power steering, power
brakes, power windows. No radio. A three speed manual tranny, no AC and on
and on. You'd get four wheels a steering wheel and three cylinder engine. (
I don't recall the name of the car, but it's being build in India. That car
is so stripped down, it only has one windshield wiper.)
All the engineering costs have already been done. Just slap it together in
a
old Pinto body and sell that sucker for $5k less than anyone else.
Would ford sell any? Sure I'd bet they would-until Motor Trend did the
review.
As for the cost driver? I don't know. I do know that with less than one
million hams in the usa, we're just a pebble along a creek bank. Out of
that
many, how many buy new radios? And with the slice of pie so thin, and your
competitors all trying for a piece of that slice, a company has to make
money quickly.
besides actual production cost in labor, parts, engineering (someone still
has to prove the whole shebang works together even with other proven
designs) there are test jigs, burn in time, spare parts have to be
purchased
and money spent on getting the okay from the FCC.
And after you do all that. One crappy review will doom the radio. All
together now, let's say 'Argonaut II' (To refresh your memory. QST ripped
the argonaut II because it didn't have the I/O port (among other problems
they sited ) that the Delta II had. Ten Ten added it later. That review
killed the Argonaut II)
Mike, WB8VGE
SunLight Energy Systems
The Heathkit Shop
http://www.theheathkitshop.com/
J e e p
o|||||||o
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced
On Sep 26, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Louis Ciotti wrote:
> I say yes this can be build... if you strip the eagle down to bare
minimum,
> and have only a the simple controls that the older rigs, how can it not
be
> built. Strip off the DSP, and have fixed filters. Most of the circuitry
> has already been designed. The Output PA is done, the VFO is done, Audio
> portion is done, all that is really needed is to repackage it. I am
talking
> about a basic HF transceiver here. No Split, no memories, to dual VFOs,
no
> fancy multi color display, no IF port, just something simple to get
people
> on the air.
>
> The Tentec Triton has the following controls:
>
> Band
> AF gain
> RF Gain
> Drive
> ALC
> Resonate
> Offset
> Mode (SSB, SSB-R, CW 1, CW 2, Tune)
> VFO
>
> With the modern designs this can be dropped to:
>
> AF Gain
> RF Gain
> ALC
> Mic Gain
> Offset
> Mode (Same modes)
> VFO
>
> That is 7 knobs.
>
> How can this not be build in a production environment and be sold for
under
> $500 and make a profit? Like I said most of the electronic design work
has
> been done already, so where is the real cost driver here?
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|