Does anyone have a Lasalle they would trade for a Nissan?
Clayton N3EV
________________________________
From: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 12:52:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison
Gosh I wish I had kept my old Studebaker.
George, W6GF
________________________________
From: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 9:38:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison
> The Corsair II is a fine radio, from what I saw of a friend's one. It
> might be adequate for all your hamming desires. However, another issue
> is how much longer will parts be available for it, should something fail?
>I am thinking the same of my various radios, Kenwood 450, and Scout, and
Argonaut V.
I suppose we can find some irony in this. Transceivers constructed
pre-digital (displays, control, DSP, etc) likely have better longevity than
those built afterwards. New chips are born quickly -- and die quickly. But
consider any Collins, Hallicrafters, or Drake gear. With minimal effort,
one can find replacement parts -- many of which are better than the
originals. For example, Sprague Orange Drops or yellow-jacked Polypropylene
in place of black beauty caps. Also, carbon film resistors in place of
carbon composition. So, if I had to keep only one set of equipment working,
I would gravitate toward pre-1980s equipment.
Paul, W9AC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|