TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure
From: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:11:49 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
"Am I willing to pay for a throw away plastic rig in order to get all kinds of 
cool extras to play with..."

Since I own an Omni VII, my answer is evidently "yes", though didn't buy it to 
get cool extras but for the receiver, which I still think is pretty good, noise 
floor always impresses me.  Also wanted to own at least one new rig built by 
professionals ( not me ), with a warranty, while recognizing that it's 
operational life was probably closer to a PC than anything else.  That's how 
everything is these days, it's a throw-away world and the time from production 
to landfill keeps getting shorter.

OTOH, also own a Drake 4 line and 2B, several CW ransmitters from the 50s, and 
Ten-Tec 509, 540, 544, and 546.  The old stuff is fine, but working on stuff 
all the time gets kinda old.  Especially the old tube gear has resistors 
changing value, capacitors becoming leaky, and the available "NOS" tubes 
probably someone else's castoffs.  It's tempting to have a "parts" rig because 
some of the components ( like switch decks ) are made from unobtanium.  
Sometimes the shack seems to more resemble a junk yard than anything else.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>