TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???
From: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:50:08 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
TNX for your reply Neal

> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600
> From: neal.laugman@gmail.com
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Was I bad???
> 
> Philip,
> 
> Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I
> doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one
> is an RF processor just as the old one is.
> 
> -- 
>  Neal, NL7VL
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:04 -0500
> "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >Good morning folks,
> >I have not seen any replies to my posts, the last one asking if any
> >one has tried the TT 715 speech processor with older TT radios.
> >
> >If I did something wrong or offended any one, I apologize.
> >
> >Phil (Andy) W3LI
> >
> >                                       
> >_______________________________________________
> >TenTec mailing list
> >TenTec@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>