TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Tuner Questions

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Tuner Questions
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:46:09 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I've found the 238 a very reliable tuner over the years, running full
legal limit on 160M and 80M.  One of these days I have to update and
get a 238C.

Barry N1EU

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Opinions about any of the Ten-Tec 238 series tuners are wanted.  I'll take the
> the good, bad or indifferent?
>
> I am considering a tuner and naturally would like something to match my Omni
> VII.  I see some advantages to the 238C in that it has a built-in balun.
>
> I've considered a Palstar AT2K but am not decided.
>
> For the record, I have two Drake tuners, MN-2000 and MN-2700. I'm using a 
> balun
> from DX Engineering with both of them.
>
>
> Feel free to send me your thoughts, richfbell@sbcglobal.net or share them with
> everyone.  Biased comments are expected and welcomed.
>
> 73 W5BXE
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>