Dave,
How much are we talking??
73,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: tentec <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, Feb 18, 2012 6:29 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes
Having worked for HP/Agilent, you'd think I'd be pushing one of
them...or a Tek
version. If you can find a nice one...great! But I gotta tell
'ya....the cheap
Chinese ones are now lookin pretty darn good. LCD displays, and ability
to save
an image as a .jpg on a thumb drive! If I was suddenly scope- less,
(and every
ham needs a scope)....I'd be looking at one!
...Dave
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 18, 2012, at 2:14 PM, "Hulett, Russell"
<rhulett1@consolidated.net>
wrote:
> I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about
troubleshooting
low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now
old,
have managed to diagnose problems without owning a scope. In one case,
the
problem with an old hollow-state receiver was found by poking around
with a
wooden dowel to expose a poor solder joint. My main concern is
spending more
money on a scope than my shack is worth, or alternately spending more
time
fixing a used scope than is warranted.
>
> Would be curious about thoghts from others who repair their own gear
about
what minimum-required scope would be.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|