TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] rx 366

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] rx 366
From: kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Nope,
The actuaal guy at TT that did a lot of the testing told me it is not as good 
on GC.
Can't remember the specifics...but you could contact TT for the details.
He told me for SWL, keep the original second RX...
He is also the one that did the testing of the install procedures.

But a SX-28 (and others) is so much better for that anyways...probably doesn't 
matter to most.

The TT Orion II is the only modern rig I have...all the others are vintage 
(Collins, Drake, Halli, Johnson, National)

73,
Lee


 -----Original Message-----
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 5:58 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] rx 366




On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:16 PM,  <kc9cdt@aol.com> wrote:

 I was told that it is GC, but the original second RX was a little better in 
hat mode..
I suspect the RX366 is actually a BETTER gc rx in all respects than
he original except for out of band rejection.  That's also assuming
ou have the appropriate roofing filter installed (original didn't
eed roofing filters).
But I could be wrong.
Barry N1EU
______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec@contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>