TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A/B rig testing
From: Rsoifer@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:38:11 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Paul,

I was there this morning, listening to Bernie here in Arizona on my Orion 
II and inverted-L.  Conditions were undoubtedly better at your QTH, but out 
here there was so much QSB that any test I could have run would have been 
meaningless.  I was happy to work him.

73 Ray W2RS

In a message dated 1/30/2013 4:16:02 PM GMT Standard Time, k9ot@yousq.net 
writes:


> Subj:[TenTec] A/B rig testing 
> Date:1/30/2013 4:16:02 PM GMT Standard Time
> From:k9ot@yousq.net
> Reply-to:tentec@contesting.com
> To:tentec@contesting.com
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> I did a little bit of A/B/C testing on 160M with my Omni VII, Peg's Eagle, 
> 
> and my Corsair II. I am not happy with the results.
> 
> I was listening to Bernie W3UR down in J7 on a beverage. I just hooked the 
> 
> same coax to each rig, so it was a few seconds between each one. He was 
> not 
> always solid copy on the Omni VII, but was Q5 on the Corsair II.
> 
> The winner was the reverse order that I have listed above. The Corsair was 
> 
> maybe 3DB better than the Omni VII, but that can make the difference 
> between 
> hearing someone and not hearing them.The Eagle was in between.
> 
> Has anyone else done this? The Omni VII is a very good radio, but just not 
> 
> the best low band one.
> 
> 73 Paul K9OT 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>