Yes, it is a very typical and inexpensive feed line. For a true
multiband antenna a balanced feed system is preferred.
73
Bob, K4TAX
> Did you have a good reason for using coax?
>
> Paul Gates
>
>> From: RMcGraw@Blomand.net
>> To: tentec@contesting.com; TenTec_Eagle@yahoogroups.com
>> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:38:02 -0600
>> Subject: [TenTec] ATU Performance & Results
>>
>> At risk of stirring the proverbial pot on this subject, I launched into
>> a morning project of seeing what the internal ATU would handle and
>> investigate if anything could be done to explain why some get better
>> results than others.
>>
>> The antenna used for this test is a center fed 75M dipole some 50 ft
>> high and having a natural resonance at 3.8 MHz. Center feedpoint has a
>> 1:1 current balun and the feedline is some 75 ft of RG-213. The output
>> of the radio is connected to a to a suitable cross needle SWR/Power
>> meter via a 1 ft RG-8x jumper. The antenna side of the SWR/Power
>> meter is connected to a Current Isolator or UNUN being a product from
>> The Wireman item # 8232. This is basically a coax jumper of some 3 ft
>> in length fitted with a series of #73 and #43 beads. This jumper is
>> connected via a barrel connector to the RG-213 feeding the antenna.
>>
>> It is noted after the initial test and repeating same for reliability,
>> I found the removal of the Current Isolator between the SWR/Power meter
>> and the coax to the antenna did cause some noticeable to very large
>> errors in the value displayed on the external SWR/Power meter. Thus
>> the value indicated on this meter were affected by circulating current
>> on the coax feed line. This is not surprising. I have had some
>> suspicion that these circulating currents may have some effect on the
>> performance of the internal ATU as well. A point not of concern was
>> the time required to attain a match as I only check one frequency on
>> each band.
>>
>> The values shown below are:
>> Band.......Frequency........SWR as shown on the radio.........SWR value
>> as shown on the external bridge with the Current Isolator in place
>>
>> These values are using the Eagle with its internal tuner:
>> 160M..........1942.......No Match......>10:1
>> 75M............3900.......1:1...................4:1
>> 60M............5357.......1.5:1................8:1
>> 40M............7100.......No Match......>10:1
>> 30M...........10114.......1:1.................10:1
>> 20M...........14325......No Match......>10:1
>> 17M...........18135.......1:1................ 10:1
>> 15M...........21290.......1.2:1................5:1
>> 12M...........24995.......1.5:1................5:1
>> 10M...........28402.......1:1...................4:1
>>
>> These values are using the Omni VII with its internal tuner:
>> 160M..........1942........No Match........>10:1
>> 75M............3900........1.1:1..................4:1
>> 60M............5357........1.5:1..................8:1
>> 40M............7100........No match.......>10:1
>> 30M...........10114........1.1:1...............10:1
>> 20M...........14325........2.5:1.............>10:1
>> 17M...........18135........1.1:1...............10:1
>> 15M...........21290........1.2:1.................5:1
>> 12M...........24995........1.4:1.................5:1
>> 10M...........28402........1.5:1.................4:1
>>
>> So what am I to conclude? The Eagle ATU matched 7 out of 10 bands and
>> the Omni VII ATU matched 8 out of 10 bands. And the use of the Current
>> Choke or line isolator does make a difference. I did go back and
>> re-test on 20M and have no explaination for the difference observed
>> between the two radios using the same procedure and equipment for
>> measurements.
>>
>> {I hope these tables stay in alignment}
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> DISCLOSURE:
>> This is to inform all persons, I am a Tentec Ambassador and I receive
>> compensation according to the Tentec Ambassador program. In addition,
>> I serve as a volunteer beta test person to Tentec for the Omni VII,
>> Eagle and Argonaut VI radios. I hold no employment relationship, no
>> financial interests nor do I conduct any commercial business, direct or
>> indirect, with Tentec.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|