TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:42:03 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Nah, mmf was pf

Barry N1EU

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tim <tim@sideswiper.plus.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As far as I can remember micro farad was designated mmf in the days of old.
>
> Tim
>
> gm3eew
>
>
> On 14/03/2013 18:28, Stuart Rohre wrote:
>
>> In 1974, the Dictionary of Electronics listed mf or mfd as alternate ways
>> to express microfarads.  The use of nano fareds also came in about post
>> 1968 or so.  Before, we had 0.01 mf caps, and 0.001 mf., etc.  Now they are
>> usually identified in nanofarads.
>>
>> Stuart Rohre
>> K5KVH
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>