TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: wb5jnc@centurytel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:15:12 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree completely.  Such forthright revelation is extremely rare.

I am not dissing TT in any way. I understand manufacturers face all sorts of technical and logistical setbacks producing technologically complex products, and I would rather TT spend time producing timely, new products than produce a fun, but non-essential, continuously updating spectrum scope. I like the radio well enough as is, and would rather TT devote development resources to newer products with wider appeal.

Just My take.  Thanks for yours.

--------------------------  K8JHR  -----------------------


On 5/20/2013 8:19 PM, Al Gulseth wrote:

is a rarity indeed to see a spokesman for a U.S. company
give a "mea culpa"

To me, this says a lot about Ten-Tec's commitment to
customer service, not to mention the continued support

___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>